Have hit burial dating idea necessary just

Posted by: Malamuro Posted on: 12.05.2020

accept. interesting

The practice dates to the Shang dynasty when cowrie shells were used, in the belief that the money would be used in the afterlife as a bribe to Yan Wang also known as Yama for a more favourable spiritual destination. Chinese burial money has been discovered dating as far back as BCE and remained popular throughout Chinese history until the advent of joss paper and Hell Money during the late 19th century CE. Burial money was modeled after the many different types of ancient Chinese coinages , and earlier forms of burial money tended to be actual money. Chinese burial money has been discovered made from stones and bones along with cowrie shells in the earliest forms, later forms include thin metallic imitations of circulation currency during the Spring and Autumn period. The Chinese custom of burying the deceased with coins can be compared to the ancient Greek and Roman customs of burying people with a coin to pay with a passage to the underworld. Chinese "Laid to Rest" burial charms are bronze funerary charms or coins usually found in graves.

In addition, previously published subsurface data on some of the folds support our interpretation of growth strata Chen et al. We collected samples from in situ coarse sand lenses and conglomerate beds at the back of shielded small caves and under overhangs Table 1 from the base of units we interpreted to be growth strata. From conglomerate beds, we separated the sand matrix from the clasts, and we only analyzed the sand.

To minimize production during incision and exhumation after initial deposition, we tried to sample sites that were well shielded by at least 30 m of rock. The samples were processed following standard procedures at the Cosmogenic Isotope Laboratory at the University of California, Santa Barbara Bookhagen and Strecker, We calculated the burial ages following Equations 1 - 6 Granger and Muzikar,using the sea-level, high-latitude SLHL production rates listed above and scaled to the sample sites following the scaling scheme of Lal and Stone Our calculations relied on three simplifying assumptions: 1 We assumed a rock density of 2.

Within the crystalline, metamorphic, and compacted sedimentary rocks, this density is a reasonable assumption. Yet, for late Quaternary fluvial gravels or initial sediment deposition and burial within a basin, which likely have a lower density, this assumption will introduce some uncertainty.

Importantly, the initial ratio of 26 Al and 10 Be in the samples is more important than - northamericanjunioramateur.com production rates of 26 Al and 10 Be. We did not propagate uncertainties in the production rates. In this study, the uncertainties in the production rates and density variations are small compared to the analytical uncertainties of the Al measurements, and, therefore, we propose it is reasonable to ignore them.

For at least four of our samples, late Quaternary river incision reduced the shielding, and postdepositional nuclide production likely had an effect on the calculated burial age. In these cases, we constrained the age of abandonment of the terrace overlying the sample using OSL and cosmogenic radionuclide depth-profile dating Anderson et al. Furthermore, for samples that were not completely shielded by steep, vertical cliffs, we measured the topographic shielding at the site and the self-shielding sample thickness, usually 15 cm for scaling the production rate, except at the Mushi anticline, where these measurements were not collected.

We then calculated the production of each isotope at a constant depth below the surface, including shielding, using Equations 3 and 4and subtracted this additional 26 Al and 10 Be concentration from the measured concentrations.

See the GSA Data Repository material for more details on the postdepositional production calculations. We assumed every parameter followed a normal distribution using a mean and standard deviation. In this section, we describe the structural and stratal geometries of the studied faults and folds, followed by details of the sampling at each site. Finally, we discuss the burial age results, correlation to existing magnetostratigraphic sections, and any corrections for postdepositional production that we applied based on our field observations.

At the outcrop scale, the Xiyu strata thicken into the core of the syncline. We interpret the thickened strata in the syncline as syndepositional growth strata related to deformation on the MPT Figs. Burial age. The stratigraphy of the basin, structural geometries, magnetostratigraphic section, and burial ages were described in detail in Thompson et al. Here, we summarize the results and present recalculated burial ages using ated production rates, mean lives, and Monte Carlo techniques for ease of comparison with the other ages.

The Xiyu Formation in the footwall of the thrust dips vertically and is locally overturned. To the south, along the Bieertuokuoyi River, the Xiyu Formation also overlies the Miocene Wuqia Group in the hanging wall, separated by an angular unconformity. These strata drape over the tip of the fault, creating growth strata that thicken into the footwall of the thrust Thompson et al.

The fault places Paleogene gypsum and marine sediments over late Quaternary terrace deposits. At the base of the basin fill, the Xiyu Formation is separated from the Wuqia Group by an erosional unconformity. At the stratigraphic top of the basin, another set of strata can be correlated to growth strata at the southern end of the basin where they overlie the Takegai thrust Thompson et al.

To date the deposition of the piggyback basin and constrain the ages of growth strata at the top and base, we previously collected a 1. DR2 from the base and top of the section.

The sample site PBB-2 at the top of the section was a smaller cave within a broad opening along tall cliffs of Xiyu Formation. Large blocks of Xiyu Formation within the broader opening and at the base of the cliffs indicate ongoing erosion through block collapse. Despite recent incision, overall shielding remains high at each site. Burial ages.

Exact burial dating was under

The two burial cosmogenic ages are 2. These ages were used to pin the magnetostratigraphic section to the GPTS. In Thompson et al. Two alternative correlations tie the section to ca. However, these alternative correlations require unreasonable sediment-accumulation-rate values, abrupt rate changes, and the absence of several longer subchrons within these time periods that were missed, despite tightly spaced sample collection. Thus, we prefer to use the correlation that spans from ca.

Regardless, any of the correlations support a latest Miocene to early Pleistocene age of the sediments. In the Bieertuokuoyi piggyback basin, the timing of large-scale collapse of the cliff face that reduced shielding of sample PBB-2 is unknown. Although we assume exposure due to block failure happened very recently past few thousand yearsfollowing persistent incision through the overlying strata, if it had occurred instantaneously at a more distant time in the past, reduced shielding would cause significant postdepositional production.

For example, if exposure had occurred ca.

From burial dating for that

However, if exposure occurred ca. Strata at the top of the section, correlated to growth strata related to the Takegai thrust, date the initiation of the Takegai thrust to ca. Growth strata at the base of the basin date the initiation of the PFT to ca. These data together indicate movement on both the Takegai thrust and PFT during the Pliocene to Quaternary, and they place a constraint on the first deformational episode on the Takegai thrust to at least ca.

The PFT, the northernmost fault of the Pamir thrust system, overrides the southwestern limb of the Mingyaole anticline Figs. Field mapping and aerial photo analysis indicate at least 2. We collected a burial sample from a cave within the Xiyu Formation located within the magnetostratigraphic section southwest Mingyaole [SWMG]; Table 1.

are absolutely right

The simple burial age is 1. Both ages support the previous magnetostratigraphic correlation.

commit error. can

Using an age of ca. The Mushi anticline is a young, blind-thrust anticline that exposes the Neogene Atushi Formation in its core and Xiyu Formation on its flanks Fig.

Deformed Quaternary terraces ranging from ca. We interpreted the thickening beds and gentler dips as growth strata on the northern flank of the fold and collected a burial sample sample Mushi north [MSN]; Table 1 ; Fig. DR4 from the strata just below the growth strata.

The sample was collected from the bottom of a small overhang at the base of a narrow valley. The simple burial age for sample MSN is 2. Although we do not have a depositional age for the terrace surface above the burial sample, nearby dated terraces lying above and below this terrace have ages of ca. Using the ages of dated terraces in the region Li et al.

Burial dating

Including postdepositional production, the MSN burial age indicates that the Mushi anticline began to deform 2. The Kelatuo anticline, the westward continuation of the Atushi anticline, lies at the western end of the Kashi-Atushi fold-and-thrust belt Figs.

In the field, the anticline is a south-dipping monocline with the northern limb of the fold cut by the south-vergent Atushi fault Fig. This interpretation is consistent with poorly imaged seismic reflection data near the anticline that indicate the structure is cored by Cretaceous strata, with the fold forming above a south-vergent fault Shang et al.

something is. Now

Structural field data and observations show a progression of gentler dips, thickening beds, and an unconformity near the base of the Xiyu Formation Liu et al. We interpreted the strata described above as growth strata, and we collected a burial sample from an overhang within a narrowly incised valley in the Xiyu Formation sample West Atushi [WATSH]; Table 1 ; Fig.

The incised valley is 46 m deep, and the overhang extends 3. Additional age constraints come from a magnetostratigraphic section through the Miocene Wuqia Group on the southern flank of the Kelatuo anticline, published by Liu et al. Thus, the magnetostratigraphic section provides a loose, but independent age constraint, indicating the burial sample should date to between 5. Given the constraints from the magnetostratigraphic section, we know the sample must be younger than ca.

To calculate an estimated burial age, we used the low 26 Al concentration, which resulted in a burial age of ca. The Atushi fault is a south-vergent fault Figs. The Atushi anticline is cored by the Miocene Wuqia Group, which has been thrust southward on top of overturned Pliocene Atushi Formation. Farther east, growth strata indicate the Atushi anticline initiated ca. On seismic reflection data line A, Fig.

Confirm. All burial dating something and excellent

In the field, fault splays are visible Figs. Total shortening on the Atushi fault from seismic reflection data is km Heermance et al. Because shielding has been reduced in recent times, but the timing of incision remains unknown, this simple burial age should be considered a minimum age. If the formation of the terrace occurred further into the past, the true burial age would be even older.

Thus, we used ca. Because the strata were deposited and folded prior to being cut by the Atushi fault, this age also implies that the Atushi fault must have initiated after 3. Using an estimated shortening of km Heermance et al. The Mingyaole anticline is a slightly north-vergent detachment fold Figs.

share your

Several unconformities are present at the base of the Xiyu Formation Scharer et al. Field observations indicate beds thicken away from the core of the fold Figs. Several late Quaternary terraces span the width of the Mingyaole fold Scharer et al.

opinion you commit

We interpret the combination of minor angular unconformities, thickening beds, and gentler dips away from the fold core as growth strata Scharer et al. The burial age from the interpreted growth strata is 0. The burial age supports the magnetostratigraphic correlation of Chen et al. In this study of alluvial strata in the western Tarim Basin, we successfully used burial dating, in conjunction with magnetostratigraphic dating, to reliably date coarse-grained basin fill using seven samples with ages spanning from ca.

Unfortunately, but like many other burial ages e. Similar to any other geochronologic technique, burial dating has limitations based on our assumptions, the geologic setting, and analytical techniques, as follows: 1 A region with high erosion rates in the source area results in a lower initial concentration of 10 Be and 26 Al, limiting the maximum age that can be derived, given analytical uncertainties.

When the initial concentration of the isotopes is low, deposits younger than ca. The 10 Be inheritance concentrations from depth profiles on late Quaternary and Holocene fluvial terraces range from 0. These inheritance values may be similar to the initial 10 Be concentrations in the sediment upon deposition, and they imply that samples from the Pamir margin had lower incoming concentrations than the samples from the Tian Shan, perhaps due to higher Pliocene and Quaternary erosion and exhumation rates in the Pamir Cao et al.

Importantly, the 10 Be concentrations in the burial samples are generally lower than the inheritance values after correcting for postdepositional productionindicating that, to a first order, the 10 Be concentrations in the burial samples are reasonable and realistic. Nearly half of our samples had high mg stable Al contents Table 2resulting in large uncertainties in the Al AMS measurements and, hence, large uncertainties on the ages Fig.

Other studies have had similar issues when using 26 Al in burial dating of basin sediments Kong et al. However, we recognize the actual uncertainties on the age may be larger than reported.

In these cases, using burial dating to pin a magnetostratigraphic section may provide an ambiguous correlation, although applying statistical methods, for example, Muzikar and Grangermay increase confidence in a correlation. Without prior knowledge of the sediment history or application of a third stable nuclide to understand sediment-transport histories of grains such as 21 Ne; Balco and Shuster, ; Vermeesch et al.

Although we assumed a simple burial history, sediments farther into the foreland may have had significant preburial histories, because the sediment could be sourced not only from the headwaters of the rivers, but also from nearby uplifted Neogene strata. Because of the age of these source sediments, the 26 Al and 10 Be concentrations were likely very low, having had sufficient time for the isotopes to decay to near zero, and the only measurable concentration results from the most recent period of exhumation and erosion.

This reasoning would imply that the ages from these sites must be interpreted as maximum ages. However, clast counts of the Xiyu strata in the Bieertuokuoyi Basin Thompson et al.

From these data, we contend that most of the sediment is likely being derived from the exhumed granitic domes and Paleozoic limestone in the nearby mountains, and there may not be a significant contribution from the recently uplifted foreland basin sediments. Postdepositional production can commonly be ignored if the sample was buried deeply until recent exposure of a sample site, but additional observations and analysis can provide the necessary information needed to calculate additional production and modify ages appropriately.

Importantly, in regions with high source-area erosion rates, and hence lower incoming concentrations, the same duration of postdepositional production will have a larger effect on a sample with a lower initial concentration.

Therefore, samples in basins that bound rapidly eroding source areas, such as the western Tarim Basin, could be more susceptible to younger apparent ages. If a value higher than the true density were used, postdepositional production would be underestimated, resulting in an apparently older age than the true age.

If a value lower than the true density were used, additional postdepositional production of the isotopes would increase the isotope concentrations, resulting in an younger apparent age. Our new burial ages, combined with previously published magnetostratigraphic sections, provide new dates for the minimum initiation of several structures in the Pamir-Tian Shan convergence zone Table 3 ; Figs.

These new data, when integrated with low-temperature thermochronology and magnetostratigraphic data from other studies, illustrate the Neogene-Quaternary propagation of deformation into the western Tarim Basin Fig.

On the northeast Pamir margin, deformation appears to have been distributed on several structures simultaneously Thompson et al. Moreover, the presence of growth strata within an uplifted alluvial fan, possibly of Pleistocene age? Restorations using seismic reflection data line B, Fig. The Kenenbierte thrust Fig. Furthermore, evidence from the Bieertuokuoyi piggyback basin supports synchronous deformation on the Takegai and Pamir Frontal thrusts between and 1.

Furthermore, the average shortening rate since initiation on the Mushi anticline is 0. On the southern margin of the Tian Shan, deformation is clearly younger southward into the foreland Fig.

Burial dating methods - Is the number one destination for online dating with more marriages than any other dating or personals site. Find single woman in the US with mutual relations. Looking for romance in all the wrong places? Now, try the right place. Men looking for a woman - Women looking for a woman. Burial money was modeled after the many different types of ancient Chinese coinages, and earlier forms of burial money tended to be actual money. Graves that were dated to the Shang dynasty period have been discovered that contain thousands of cowrie shells, for example, the Fu Hao-mu, dating to about the year BCE, was discovered containing 6, cowry shells. burial dating Cosmogenic-nuclide burial dating relies on a pair of cosmic-ray-produced nuclides that are produced in the same rock or mineral target at a ?xed ratio, but have different half-lives. For example, 26Al and 10Be are produced in quartz at 26AlBe= If a sample of quartz is exposed at the surface for a time, Al and.

On the western southern Tian Shan, deformation stepped basinward in four primary phases Fig. The South Tian Shan fault, which initiated ca.

In addition, an increase in sediment-accumulation rates ca. This age is supported by an increase in the sediment-accumulation rate of middle Miocene sediments ca.

Oct 22,   Burial dating plot showing the 26 Al/ 10 Be ratio and the 10 Be concentration (atoms/g of quartz) in the samples, with 1? uncertainty envelopes. Radioactive decay of the isotopes (black dashed lines) at different initial source area erosion rates and million-year isochrons for sediment burial following steady erosion are northamericanjunioramateur.com by: 8. Burial dating isochron for gravels sampled in this study. Each data point represents measurements of an individual clast, with the ellipses representing 1-s analytical uncertainty.

Because we do not know the total shortening accommodated by the Kelatuo anticline, we assume it has a similar magnitude of shortening to folds farther east that involve similar stratigraphy. The third stage is the initiation of the Atushi fault, which we constrain in this study at ca. Photo credit: Ian Hey. Cosmogenic nuclide production rates vary according to latitude and elevation. These factors must be measured by the scientist, and are accounted for in the calculation of the exposure age. Topographic shielding, for example by a nearby large mountain, also affects the production rate of cosmogenic nuclides.

This is because the cosmic rays, which bombard Earth at a more or less equal rate from all sectors of the sky, will be reduced if the view of the sky is shielded - for example, by a large mountain that the rays cannot penetrate. Scientists must therefore carefully measure the horizon line all for degrees all around their boulder. Solifluction lobes on the Ulu Peninsula. Solifluction is common in periglacial environments, and can result in rolling, burial and movement of boulders on slopes.

As mentioned above, sampling strategy is the most import factor in generating a reliable cosmogenic nuclide age. Post-depositional processes, such as rolling, burial, exhumation or cover with vegetation can result in interruption of the accumulation of cosmogenic nuclides and a younger than expected age.

this excellent

Alternatively, if the boulder has not undergone sufficient erosion to remove previously accumulated cosmogenic nuclides, it will have an older than expected age. This is called inheritance. This can be a particular problem in Antarctica, where cold-based ice may repeatedly cover a boulder, preventing the accumulation of cosmogenic nuclides, without eroding or even moving the rock. Rocks can therefore be left in a stable position or moved slightly, without having suffiicient erosion to remove cosmogenic nuclides from a previous exposure.

This can result in a complex exposure history. This is typically characterised by spread of exposure ages across a single landform. Dating just one boulder from a moraine may therefore be an unreliable method to rely on.

Scientists may also screen for complex exposure by using two different isotopes, such as aluminium and beryllium 26 Al and 10 Be. The Production Rate of cosmogenic nuclides varies spatially, but is generally assumed to have remained constant at a particular location. Published production rates are available for different parts of the Earth.

DATING PANGULONG MARCOS, 'DI BIBIGYAN NG STATE FUNERAL

Glacial geologists target elements that only occur in minerals in rocks, such as quartz, through cosmic-ray bombardment, such as aluminium and beryllium 26 Al and 10 Be. Beryillium is used most widely, as it has the best determined production rate and can be measured at low concentrations[3].

Chlorine 36 Cl can also be used to date the exposure age of basalt lavas[4]. Bethan Davies using HF to dissolve rocks for cosmogenic nuclide dating. Note the personal protection equipment!

The first stage in the calculation of a cosmogenic nuclide exposure age is to extract the quartz from a rock. This is quite an involved process and means using some quite dangerous chemicals, such as HF Hydrogen Flouride.

HF is an acid with a pH of about 3, but the small molecule is easily absorbed by your skin. Once absorbed, it reacts vigorously with the calcium in your bones, forming Calcium Flouride which may then be deposited in your arteries. All in all, not a substance you want to get on your skin!

Scientists must therefore take strong precautions before using this chemical. The first stage is to crush the rock or rock fragments in a jaw crusher. The crusher must be perfectly clean to avoid contamination.

The crushed rock is then sieved to the right size. Magnetic seperation removes particles with lots of iron such as micasleaving you if you sampled granite, for example with a g sample of sand, comprising mostly feldspar and quartz. Feldspar is removed by placing the sample in Hexafloursilicic acid or HF on a shaking table for around 2 weeks.

The acids are changed daily. The more durable quartz is left behind. A series of chemical precipitations leaves you with Beryllium Oxide BeOa white powder. It is mixed with Niobium NB and pressed into a copper cathode. Once the ratio of cosmogenic to naturally occuring isotopes has been calculated, the production rate is used to calculate an exposure age.

This varies with altitude and latitude. Topographic shielding and shielding by snow, vegetation or soil is also taken into account.

The combination of burial dating and paleomagnetic stratigraphy offers much more robust dating results than either method can provide alone. Over the past two decades, cosmogenic nuclide burial dating with 26 Al and 10 Be has been widely used in geomorphology, archaeology and paleoanthropology (Granger, ; Granger et al., ).Author: Lan Luo, Lan Luo, Darryl E. Granger, Darryl E. Granger, Hua Tu, Zhongping Lai, Guanjun Shen, Christo. This is an ideal setting for a geologic application of burial dating, because the timing of river incision is thought to be linked to climate history (Miotke and Palmer, ). Granger et al. collected sediment from the entire vertical extent of the Mammoth Cave system. They were able to identify seven major events in the cave's. Burial dating is in some respects similar to a different technique called surface exposure dating, in that both rely on the in situ production of cosmogenic nuclides. It is crucial for both methods that in situ production decreases with depth beneath the ground surface, approaching zero at large northamericanjunioramateur.com by:

There are a number of online calculators that can be used to calculate the exposure age. The video below, produced by Science Bulletins, National Centre for Science Library, nicely and simply illustrates the core concepts in cosmogenic exposure age dating. Davies, B. Hambrey, J.

are mistaken

Smellie, J. Carrivick, and N. Glasser, Quaternary Science Reviews31 0 : Balco, G. Contributions and unrealized potential contributions of cosmogenic-nuclide exposure dating to glacier chronology, Quaternary Science Reviews30 : Johnson, J. Smellie, A. Nelson, and F. Stuart, Global and Planetary Change69 4 : Mackintosh, A. White, D.

Fink, D. Gore, J.

Consider, burial dating agree

Pickard, and P. Fanning, Exposure ages from mountain dipsticks in Mac. Chinese "Laid to Rest" burial charms are bronze funerary charms or coins usually found in graves. They measure from 2. These coins were mostly found in graves dating from the late Qing dynasty period, though one was found in a coin hoard of Northern Song dynasty coins. These coins are often excluded from numismatic reference books on Chinese coinage or talismans due to many taboosas they were placed in the mouths of dead people and are considered unlucky and disturbing, and are undesired by most collectors.

In the book Han Material Culture written by the Sinologist Sophia-Karin Psarras it is stated that any representation of real life currency was considered legal tender that could be used as a medium of exchange in the afterlife.

While initially the aristocracy tended to buried with genuine specimens of "high currency", later clay versions of these coinages were also produced. Cash coins had a special significance for the ancient Chinese in reference to their concept of the afterlife. The burial of clay Ban Liang cash coins followed that closely of earlier burials of real circulation coins, as aroun Ban Liang cash coins were discovered inside of the tomb of Liu Fei, Prince of Jiangdu.

Over time the Chinese view of what Wu Zhu cash coins meant for the deceased evolved.

agree, very

Prior to clay Wu Zhu cash coins being used real Wu Zhu's were still being buried. In Chinese archeologists uncovered 10 tonnes of bronze Wu Zhu cash coins from the Western Han dynasty or around 2 million cash coins alongside over ten thousand of other iron, bronze, and gold items in the Haihunhou cemetery near NanchangJiangxiamong the other uncovered items were bamboo slipswood tablets, as well as jade objects.

As these Wu Zhu cash coins were strung in strings of pieces this proved that the practice of stringing cash coins per didn't first happen during the Tang dynasty as was previously thought but actually six hundred years earlier. During the Tang dynasty period clay coins weren't exclusively produced as burial coins, as there was an area that was declared to be a form of "autonomous region" in what is today known as Hebei province that at the time was under the dominion of Liu Rengonga local warlord.

Clay burial coins that imitate the cash coins of later periods are commonly found in more recent Chinese tombs. Clay burial coins which imitate both Song dynasty period and Jurchen Jin dynasty period cash coins have been discovered in a tomb that is located in the province of Shanxi. Paper burial money dates back to around the mid 3rd century CE.

In the Western world clay imitations of Jinbing have in the past been mistakenly misidentified as "glazed plates of food". These money trees should not be with coin trees which are a by-product of the manufacture of cash coinsbut due to their similarities it is thought by some experts that they may have been related. Various legends from China dating to the Three Kingdoms period mention a tree that if shaken would cause coins to fall from its branches.

Money trees as a charm have been found in Southwest Chinese tombs from the Han dynasty, and are believed to have been placed there to help guide the dead to the afterlife and provide them with monetary support.

According to one myth, a farmer watered the money tree seed with his sweat and watered its sapling with his blood, after which the mature tree provided eternal wealth; this implies a moral that one can only become wealthy through their own toil. The leaves of the Paulownia become yellow in autumn and take on the appearance of gold or bronze cash coins.

The earliest money trees, however, date to the Han dynasty in present-day Sichuan and a Taoist religious order named the Way of the Five Pecks of Rice. Archeoloigsts uncovered money trees as tall as 1. Silk fabric was considered to be a valuable form of commodity in China during ancient and imperial times and bolts of silk could also be used as a type of currency because of its high market value. The silk funerary money that was recovered from the Mawangdui site was moved to be on display at the Hunan Provincial Museumas of March Because of this discovery, it is now believed by some Chinese archaeologists that the Warring States period State of Chu's rather distinctive looking sheet form of gold coinage, which in the modern era is known as Ying Yuanwith the closely linked small squares that might have in fact been inspired by this ancient type of Chinese silk money.

The Chinese customs of burial money has also been observed by other Chinese cultured countries like Korea and Vietnam. Chinese burial coins are typically not included in Chinese coin catalogues.



Facebook twitter google_plus reddit linkedin

Saramar

2 Replies to “Burial dating”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *